<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Reacties op: Universal Binary + Linux?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Door: Marco Raaphorst</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-11490</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Raaphorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/#comment-11490</guid>
		<description>I would love to see some tests with Ardour running on both OSX and Linux. But the main point is: wouldn&#039;t it be great if some companies would invest some time into Linux for audio? The first company who would do that might be onto something huge because a lot of users want that. 

The main issue about Linux is that people think everything is free as in &#039;free beer&#039; which is not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see some tests with Ardour running on both OSX and Linux. But the main point is: wouldn&#8217;t it be great if some companies would invest some time into Linux for audio? The first company who would do that might be onto something huge because a lot of users want that. </p>
<p>The main issue about Linux is that people think everything is free as in &#8216;free beer&#8217; which is not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Am</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-11432</link>
		<dc:creator>Am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/#comment-11432</guid>
		<description>The article you quote doesn&#039;t say that Linux is faster than OSX, but that some very specific application&#039;s implementation is faster on Linux.  It&#039;s caused by different alghorithm&#039;s of standard memory allocation function, but there&#039;s a long road from this fact to saying that Linux is faster than OSX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article you quote doesn&#8217;t say that Linux is faster than OSX, but that some very specific application&#8217;s implementation is faster on Linux.  It&#8217;s caused by different alghorithm&#8217;s of standard memory allocation function, but there&#8217;s a long road from this fact to saying that Linux is faster than OSX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Marco Raaphorst</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-6444</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Raaphorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/#comment-6444</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dan. This looks interesting. When I have some time I hope I can check this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dan. This looks interesting. When I have some time I hope I can check this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Dan Easley</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-6421</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Easley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/#comment-6421</guid>
		<description>No.  ALSA now supports software mixing, negating the abovementioned exclusivity.  

However, JACK - at http://jackaudio.org/ - offers low-latency interapplication audio routing beyond anything available on commercial platforms, and has for a few years now.  I routinely and arbitrarily route audio and control signals to and from a number of synthesis, sampling, effect and recording programs with a total latency of 5.8ms.  We don&#039;t need commercial programs - we need volunteers to write presets for the programs we already have.

See http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/packages.html for a listing of programs available on just one of the now numerous audio-centric linux distributions available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  ALSA now supports software mixing, negating the abovementioned exclusivity.  </p>
<p>However, JACK &#8211; at <a href="http://jackaudio.org/" rel="nofollow">http://jackaudio.org/</a> &#8211; offers low-latency interapplication audio routing beyond anything available on commercial platforms, and has for a few years now.  I routinely and arbitrarily route audio and control signals to and from a number of synthesis, sampling, effect and recording programs with a total latency of 5.8ms.  We don&#8217;t need commercial programs &#8211; we need volunteers to write presets for the programs we already have.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/packages.html" rel="nofollow">http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/packages.html</a> for a listing of programs available on just one of the now numerous audio-centric linux distributions available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Marco Raaphorst</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-5704</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Raaphorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/05/27/universal-binary-linux/#comment-5704</guid>
		<description>Thanks Grackle for your comments. You seem to have more knowledge about this subject. Hopefully Big Brother is watching us :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Grackle for your comments. You seem to have more knowledge about this subject. Hopefully Big Brother is watching us :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
